USPTO serial 75314941
QUERY WIZARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUERY WIZARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kingston, Ontario K7L 5J8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS K EBLING
LOUIS K EBLING FROST & JACOBS2500 PNC CTR201 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4182Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs, for providing access to extracts from news source databsesand bulletin boards, newspapers, wire services, boradcasts, and related news services, sold as an integral component of computer software | ABANDONED | May 26, 1996 |
| 041 | providing instruction to customers in the use of computer software for information management, communications computer software linking data bases and services in remote computers, litigation support computer software, and other data base management computer software | ABANDONED | May 26, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |