USPTO serial 75315506
THE LEGAL CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LEGAL CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BONNY B. PLOSKER, RICK D. MCMURTRY, JENNIFER M. GRUBER, CLAIRE M. KIMBALL, AND ANY/ALL OTHER ATTORNEYS IN THE TBS, INC., LEGAL DEPT., TRADEMARK GROUP
BONNY B PLOSKER, RICK D MCMURTRY, JENN TBS, INC LEGAL DEPT TRADEMARK GROUPC/O TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM INCONE CNN CTR 13 NATLANTA, GA 30303Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Courtroom Television Network
- Other trademarks owned by Courtroom Television Network
- Other trademarks owned by Courtroom Television Network LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE LEGAL CAFE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |