USPTO serial 75315774
10SIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 10SIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA R SHUFRO
BARBARA R SHUFRO PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP1100 NEW YORK AVE NW 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SegaSoft
- Other trademarks owned by SEGASOFT NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SEGASOFT NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 10SIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2000 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |