USPTO serial 75315909
GL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. PATCH
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | articles of leather and imitation leather and goods made of these materials, namely, wallets, credit card cases, business card cases, satchels, briefcases, handbags, trunks, suitcases, purses and travelling bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |