USPTO serial 75316356
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
B-2550 KONTICH, BE
B-1040 BRUSSEL (SCHAARBEEK), BE
B-1040 BRUSSEL (SCHAARBEEK), BE
B-1040 BRUSSEL (SCHAARBEEK), BE
KONTICH, BE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROSCOPES; X-RAY MICROSCOPES; COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING SURGICAL AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN LABORATORIES, NAMELY, X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY/RADIOLOGY SCANNERS, PORTABLE X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY/RADIOLOGY SCANNERS, AND X-RAY LAMINOGRAPHY/RADIOGRAPHY SCANNERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GENERAL IMAGE PROCESSING FOR SURGICAL, MEDICAL AND LABORATORY APPARATUS; AND APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN LABORATORIES, NAMELY, X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS, TOMOGRAPHS, MICROTOMOGRAPHS, X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY/RADIOLOGY SCANNERS, PORTABLE X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY/RADIOLOGY SCANNERS, AND X-RAY LAMINOGRAPHY/RADIOGRAPHY SCANNERS; AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPES | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |