USPTO serial 75316597
PACABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PACABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-113 33 Stockholm, SE
SE-113 33 Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A VANDERHYE
ROBERT A VANDERHYE NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | non-mechanical, metal, reels and drums for electrical cable, line, wire and hose and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | POWER OPERATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE WINDING, UNWINDING, REELING, AND HANDLING OF CABLE, LINE, WIRE AND HOSE, NAMELY, WINDERS, UNWINDERS, REELERS, AND HANDLERS; MECHANICAL REELS AND DRUMS FOR ELECTRICAL CABLE, LINE, WIRE, AND HOSE AND PARTS THEREOF, COILING MACHINES FOR COILING, ENVELOPING, UNCOILING, HANDLING AND MANEUVERING OF DRUMS AND REELS FOR ELECTRICAL CABLE, LINE, WIRE, AND HOSE AND PARTS THEREOF, SYSTEMS FOR COILING , ENVELOPING, UNCOILING, HANDLING AND MANEUVERING OF DRUMS AND REELS FOR ELECTRICAL CABLE, LINE, WIRE, AND HOSE COMPRISING COILING MACHINES, AND COIL ASSEMBLIES COMPRISING HOLLOW TUBULAR SLEEVES, SIDE SUPPORTS AND A RELEASABLE SHAFT AND PROTECTIVE CASINGS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | power operated mechanical equipment for the winding, unwinding, reeling, and handling of cable, line, wire and hose | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | services for the rental of tools and rental of equipment for winding and unwinding cable, line, wire, and hose | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ulvator AB
- Other trademarks owned by Ulvator AB
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named PACABLE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |