USPTO serial 75316953
CLEARSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELNICK, DIANE B.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEARSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2800-Lyngby, DK
2800-Lyngby, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L SAPP
STEPHEN L SAPP LOCKE, LIDDELL & SAPP, LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Local area network and wide area network computer hardware, computer network interface and adapter cards for use on computers, together with modems in combination therewith, wiring structural components, HUBs and concentrators, controlled attachment modules, controlled access units and multistation access units, repeaters, bridges, routers, multiprotocol routers and brouters, chassis, modules, switches, modems, network management computer hardware, video conferencing computer hardware; computer software for the control and operation of the computer hardware and equipment identified above; and instruction manuals all sold as a unit for use therewith; none of the aforesaid goods for use in connection with wireless communications, including wireless communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |