USPTO serial 75317950
ENERGY POINTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGY POINTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saskatchewan Power Corporation
Regina, Saskatchewan, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H DEITS
DAVID H DEITS SEED & BERRY6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | public utility services in the nature of electricity distribution featuring a consumer reward program in which consumers receive credits redeemable as merchandise or as utility bill payments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |