Drawing for XSCALAR

USPTO serial 75318017

XSCALAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XSCALAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware, semiconductor products, computer memory devices, solid state memory devices, flash memory devices, single cell transistor memories, non-volatile memory components, random access memory devices, flash memory components, mult-level cell flash memory components, singular and multiple bit per cell memory devicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance