USPTO serial 75318022
AGRILINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGRILINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Morely, Western Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN G MULLEN
MARTIN G MULLEN HENDERSON & STURM1213 MIDLAND BLDGDES MOINES, IA 50309-4076UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for monitoring soil conditions; computer hardware and software for monitoring the presence, distribution and spread of disease and pests in crops and soil; moisture detecting probes and sensors; electrical controllers for use with water distribution systems and disease and pest control systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Irrigation units, namely, reticulators, irrigators; parts and accessories for aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services related to the monitoring of soil moisture content and the delivery of water to crops, namely, installation services pertaining to soil monitoring apparatus, advisory and support services in relation to the use of the soil monitoring apparatus for the control of irrigation and reticulation systems and the training of the use of the soil monitoring apparatus; services related to the management of water delivery to irrigated and reticulated crops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |