USPTO serial 75318057
VELOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VELOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kyoto-shi, Kyoto-fu, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEAN M MCGINN
SEAN M MCGINN WHITHAM CURTIS WHITHAM & MCGINN PC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 900RESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | writing ink, ball-point pens, fibertip pens, fountain pens, pencils, mechanical pencils, pencil writing leads, chalks, markers, crayons, pastels, rubber erasers, correction fluid, ink erasers, glue pens and adhesive sold as a unit therewith, adhesives for statinery or household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |