Drawing for MILWAUKEE BUCKS 30TH ANNIVERSARY B

USPTO serial 75318240

MILWAUKEE BUCKS 30TH ANNIVERSARY B

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOBO, DEBORAH E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILWAUKEE BUCKS 30TH ANNIVERSARY B?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A FRIEDMAN

RICHARD A FRIEDMAN NBA PROPERTIES INCOLYMPIC TWR645 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio, video, computer and laser discs featuring basketball; pre-recorded audio and video cassettes featuring basketball; pre-recorded audio and video tapes featuring basketball; pre-recorded compact discs featuring basketball; pre-recorded computer discs featuring basketball; computer accessories, namely, computer software screen savers related to basketball and mouse pads; computer programs featuring information, statistics and/or trivia about basketball; computer operating systems in the field of basketball; computer video games comprised of hardware and software; video game cartridges; video game machines for use with televisionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 25, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 23, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance