USPTO serial 75318266
BRUN TUMULTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2605041Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRUN TUMULTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
75008 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE P. FOXMAN
MICHELLE P FOXMAN FROSS, ZELNICK, LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED STATES PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [perfume, eau de cologne, toilet waters; skin creams for the face, hands and body; perfumed body milks, body lotions, body gels, body oils and body powders; perfumed bath and shower gels, perfumed soaps, perfumed moisturizing creams, talcum powder and deodorants for the body; and] cosmetics, namely, lipstick, [eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, foundation creams, foundation make-up, foundation base, compact powder foundation, pressed powder, free powder and blush] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTER PARFUMS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BRUN TUMULTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |