USPTO serial 75318552
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Visa International Service Association
Foster City, CA
Other trademarks owned by Visa International Service Association
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION LLC
ST. LOUIS, MO
Other trademarks owned by SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION LLC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S FLEMING
DAVID S FLEMING BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE PCNBC TWR STE 3600455 N CITYFRONT PLZ DRCHICAGO, IL 60611-5599| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consulting services regarding development and testing of software developed by others, in the fields of encryption and protection of information, banking, credit, debit and payment services, and funds transfers | ACTIVE | Feb 23, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |