Drawing for SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION

USPTO serial 75318553

SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID S FLEMING

DAVID S FLEMING BRNIKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer consulting services regarding development and testing of software developed by others, in the fields of encryption and protection of information, banking, credit, debit and payment services, and funds transfersACTIVEJun 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 19, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 18, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 18, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance