USPTO serial 75318553
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION LLC
ST. LOUIS, MO
Other trademarks owned by SET SECURE ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION LLC
Visa International Service Association
Foster City, CA
Other trademarks owned by Visa International Service Association
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S FLEMING
DAVID S FLEMING BRNIKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consulting services regarding development and testing of software developed by others, in the fields of encryption and protection of information, banking, credit, debit and payment services, and funds transfers | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |