USPTO serial 75318669
EOCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EOCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD W GREASON
EDWARD W GREASON KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video recording system comprised of a video mixer, system controller, video monitor, keyboard, foot switch, video printer, video tape recorder, relay unit, connecting cables and carrying cart | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | endoscopic observation system comprised of a surgical and medical endoscope, catheter, probe, medical examination light and endoscopic observation apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS OPTICAL COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OLYMPUS OPTICAL COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EOCT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |