Drawing for HEALTHY CHOICE PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP

USPTO serial 75318813

HEALTHY CHOICE PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY CHOICE PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK C STEPHENSON

PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ PC1 CENTRAL PARK PLZ222 S 15TH STOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029prepared dinners and entrees consisting primarily of beef, poultry, seafood and/or vegetables; stews; soups; chili with beans; chili without beans; egg product; ground beef and frankfurters; processed meats; cheese; lunch meats; cream cheese; seafood; fish fillets; fish steaks; fish portions; potato salad; chicken salad; tuna salad; crab salad; imitation crab salad; pork; pork cuts; beef; beef cuts; sliced, cubed, diced and/or cut ham, chicken and/or turkey; shredded and/or cubed cheese; shredded, chopped, cut, washed, trimmed processed and/or unprocessed lettuce and vegetables; vegetable salads; vegetable-based dips; fruit-based dips; dairy-based dips; snack dips; vegetable salads; create-your-own salad kits consisting primarily of ham, chicken, turkey, cheese, lettuce and/or vegetables in combination with croutons, salad dressing, salsa and/or chips; soup and soup mixesABANDONED—
030prepared dinners and entrees consisting primarily of pasta and/or rice; spaghetti; lasagna; bakery goods; bread; frozen confections; pizza; barbecue sauce; spaghetti sauce; breakfast cereal; ice cream; pre-cooked, ready-to-eat, frozen bread having a meat, cheese and/or vegetable filling; pasta salad; pasta salad with vegetables; pasta salad with chicken; croutons; salsa; salad dressingsABANDONED—
031unpopped popcornABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance