USPTO serial 75318988
PICKLES, PEPPERS, POTS & PANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICKLES, PEPPERS, POTS & PANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN H GERSTEIN
ALLEN H GERSTEIN MARSHALL O'TOOLE GERSTEIN MURRAY & BORUNSEARS TWR STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | cookware, namely, pots, pans, stock pots, roasters, bakeware, and glass and stoneware casserole dishes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Gourmet foods, namely, jellies, jams, processed olives, cooking oil, pickles, processed peppers, soups, potato chips, and cheese | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Gourmet foods, namely, coffee, tea, chocolate, chocolate candies, spices, salsa, sauces, candy, mustards, cookies, crackers, salad dressing, tortilla chips, and pastas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Dell, Glenn J.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Dell, Glenn J.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PICKLES, PEPPERS, POTS & PANS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |