USPTO serial 75319211
TIRECRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2820564Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2004
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIRECRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOAN L DILLON
JOAN L DILLON JOAN DILLON LAW, LLC3530 ASHFORD DUNWOODY RDPMB 235ATLANTA, GA 30319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automotive parts and repair parts, namely, tires, tubes, retreaded tires, tire repair patches, plugs, plug-patches and retread sections, custom and steel wheels, wheel dust caps, wheel lug nuts, weights used in balancing wheels, shocks, struts, springs, brake discs, brake pads, front brakes and automotive filters, namely air filters, U-joints and fitted brake hoses and wheel bearings used in the repair of the drive train | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale stores featuring automotive, farm and industrial equipment tires, wheels, automotive repair parts and accessories for the repair of motor vehicles, industrial and farm equipment (motorized and unmotorized) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tirecraft Auto Centers Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Tirecraft Auto Centers Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Tirecraft Auto Centers Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TIRECRAFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |