USPTO serial 75319220
TIRECRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIRECRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherwood Park, Alberta, CA
Sherwood Park, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOAN L DILLON
JOAN L DILLON KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Automotive oil and lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automotive batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automotive parts and repair parts, namely, tires, tubes, retreaded tires, tire repair patches, plugs, plug-patches and retread sections, custom and steel wheels, wheel dust caps, wheel lug nuts, weights used in balancing wheels, shocks, struts, springs, brake discs, brakes pads, front brakes and automotive filters, namely air filters, U-joints and fitted brake hoses and wheel bearings used in the repair of the drive train | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale stores featuring automotive, farm and industrial equipment tires, wheels, automotive repair parts and accessories for the repair of motor vehicles, industrial and farm equipment, motorized and unmotorized | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Automotive tire repair services, namely, retreading, repairing, balancing, rotating, installing, studding and ciping and liquid and cast ballast services, vehicle oil change services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Vehicle inspection services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tirecraft Auto Centers Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Tirecraft Auto Centers Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TIRECRAFT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |