USPTO serial 75319289
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS F GOULD JR
LEWIS F GOULD JR ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT1700 MARKET ST - STE 3232PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | manually operated metal valves, valve fittings and parts therefor, couplings, and manifolds for use in connection with diving equipment | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1996 |
| 009 | underwater diving equipment, namely, regulators, gauges, hoses, connectors, compressed air tanks and cylinders, dive computers, diving gloves, thermometers and compasses | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1996 |
| 011 | lanterns and flashlights for use in diving | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1996 |
| 018 | duffel bags, regulator bags, pony tank bags and backpacks | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1996 |
| 025 | clothing, for scuba divers, namely, T-shirts, jackets, wetsuits, drysuits, boots, gloves, vests, hoods, and hats | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1996 |
| 028 | scuba diving and snorkeling equipment, namely, buoyancy compensators, vests, goggles, air cell harnesses, diving masks, fins, snorkels, cummerbunds and weight belts | ABANDONED | Dec 20, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |