USPTO serial 75319571
SUPER COLOSTRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2371774Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2000
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER COLOSTRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marina del Rey, CA
Marina del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTIN C. CASTLE
KRISTIN C CASTLE SIERRA PATENT GROUPPO BOX 6149STATELINE, NV 89449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional supplements | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2004 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 2, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |