Drawing for GLOSSY.COM

USPTO serial 75319580

GLOSSY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOSSY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RAYMOND A KURZ

RAYMOND A KURZ ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & KURZ555 13TH ST NW STE 701 EWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed material, namely, magazines, books, and newsletters relating to young women's lifestyle, fashion and entertainmentACTIVE—
021beverage glassware, namely, mugsACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, T-shirts, jackets, and hatsACTIVE—
035advertising agency services in the nature of arranging for and providing advertising time and space for others on computer networks; dissemination of advertising for others via on-line electronic communications networkACTIVE—
041entertainment in the nature of on-going radio and television shows in the field of young women's lifestyle and fashionACTIVE—
042providing a web site and associated on-line bulletin board featuring a wide variety of information primarily related to young women's lifestyle and fashion and also including reviews and entertainment oriented features related thereto; computer services, namely, providing a central repository of organized links to the web sites and on-line resources of others featuring information primarily related to young women's lifestyle and fashion and also including reviews and entertainment oriented features related theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance