USPTO serial 75319785
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW HYDE PARK, NY
PRO-SERVICE FORWARDING CO., INC.
NEW HYDE PARK, NY
PRO-SERVICE FORWARDING CO., INC.
NEW HYDE PARK, NY
International Service Group, Inc.
South San Francisco, CA
International Service Group, Inc.
South San Francisco, CA
International Service Group, Inc.
South San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY S. STEEN
JEFFREY S STEEN CARTER, DELUCA, FARRELL & SCHMIDT LLP445 BROAD HOLLOW RD STE 225MELVILLE, NY 11747UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |