USPTO serial 75319918
INJECTION TECH BY CROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INJECTION TECH BY CROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY1 LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automobile parts, namely, remanufactured fuel injectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |