USPTO serial 75320139
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
Amy E. Carroll DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K STREET, N.W.Suite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |