Drawing for TO DREAM, TO DARE, TO WIN

USPTO serial 75320157

TO DREAM, TO DARE, TO WIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TO DREAM, TO DARE, TO WIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK A FLAGEL

MARK A FLAGEL LATHAM & WATKINS633 W 5TH ST STE 4000LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail services, in the field of clothing, jewelry, cosmetic necessities, swimwear and souvenirsACTIVE—
041casino services; entertainment services, namely, musical and theater entertainment, sporting events, and facilities for recreation activitiesACTIVE—
042resort hotel services, hotel concierge services, hotel services for preferred guests, health spa, catering services, beverage services, providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, snack bar, food preparation and dine in and carry out restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 5, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 22, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 6, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 9, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance