Drawing for TE LE FE

USPTO serial 75320344

TE LE FE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CHAD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TE LE FE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising, namely, preparing audio-visual presentations, television advertising agencies, dissemination of advertising matter, rental of advertising space; and promoting and organizing sports competitions, sporting events, concerts and theatrical performances of othersACTIVE—
038radio and television broadcasting rendered by satellite or cable transmission; rental of telecommunication equipment, radio equipment, television equipment, and audio or video recordingsACTIVE—
041production of theatrical performances, sports events, radio and televison programs related to entertainment, news, education and current events, radio and television broadcasting and the use of telecommunication equipmentACTIVE—
042news agencies, namely, gathering and dissemination of news; consulting services in the field of radio and television broadcasting and use of telecommunications equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 9, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 1999IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 15, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance