Drawing for BLINK

USPTO serial 75320806

BLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE INFORMATION UNIT

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd Braverman, Esq.

Todd Braverman, Esq. Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer LLP1500 Broadway, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed matter, namely, magazines targeted toward youth through the age of 25 in the fields of lifestyle, film, popular culture, television, technology, photography, art, book excerpts and reviews, and magazine excerpts and reviewsACTIVE—
041providing information to youth through the age of 25 in the fields of lifestyle, film, popular culture, television, photography, art, book excerpts and reviews, and magazine excerpts and reviewsACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines targeted toward youth through the age of 25 in the fields of lifestyle, film, popular culture, television, technology, photography, art, book excerpts and reviews, and magazine excerpts and reviews; providing information to youth through the age of 25 in the fields of technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 29, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 10, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance