USPTO serial 75321112
OPTIMUM ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMUM ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LERNER
MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing multiple user access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of entertainment, education and a wide variety of other types of information, all by means of broadband cable network | ABANDONED | Dec 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2016 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |