USPTO serial 75321558
KABENOANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KABENOANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant services, namely, catering featuring spaghetti | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |