USPTO serial 75321578
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fort Lauderdale, FL
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky
Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky Novak Druce + Quigg LLP525 Okeechobee Blvd, 15th FloorWest Palm Beach, FL 33401UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | wood storage cases for audio tapes and video tapes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |