USPTO serial 75321840
WHATEVER IT TAKES TO MAKE YOUR WEEKEND GREAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHATEVER IT TAKES TO MAKE YOUR WEEKEND GREAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | car and truck rental services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |