Drawing for DIGITAL BROADCAST STUDIO

USPTO serial 75321936

DIGITAL BROADCAST STUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL BROADCAST STUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AARON B RETZER

AARON B RETZER EPSTEIN EDELL & RETZER1901 RESEARCH BLVD STE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009integrated computer software and hardware forsingle-casting, multi-casting or broadcasting of digital audio program materials for use in delivery of guaranteed digital media over a global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 23, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 25, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 21, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance