USPTO serial 75322375
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY M. ANDERSON
BRIAN P KINDER FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DRIVE. 10TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | polishing films, polishing oils, lapping films, lapping compounds, lapping oils, and polishing slurries for use on gemstones, crystals, optical surfaces and metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | high precision cutting and polishing machines and replacement parts therefore, namely, saws having sintered, diamond, abrasive, or dicing blades, polishing pads, papers, cloths and plates and workholding clamps for use on gemstones, crystals, optical surfaces and metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |