Drawing for KIWI

USPTO serial 75322452

KIWI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIWI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR J DEBAUGH

BRUCE O BRADFORD SARA LEE CORPORATIONIP LAW DEPT1000 E HANES MILL RDWINSTON SALEM, NC 27105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Sponges for scouring, scrubbing and dusting; scraping brushes, mitts of fabric for cleaning, chamois cloth and rags for dryingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 12, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 11, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance