USPTO serial 75322597
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
N.E.W. CUSTOMER SERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
STERLING, VA
Other trademarks owned by N.E.W. CUSTOMER SERVICE COMPANIES, INC.
NATIONAL ELECTRONICS WARRANTY CORPORATION
STERLING, VA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL ELECTRONICS WARRANTY CORPORATION
N.E.W. HOME WARRANTY SERVICES, INC.
STERLING, VA
Other trademarks owned by N.E.W. HOME WARRANTY SERVICES, INC.
STERLING, VA
N.E.W. SELLERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
STERLING, VA
National Electronics Warranty Corporation
Sterling, VA
Other trademarks owned by National Electronics Warranty Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH J HAUTMAN
KENNETH J HAUTMAN HOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | offering and administering extended service programs for a wide variety of goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |