Drawing for COGENCE MEDIA

USPTO serial 75322735

COGENCE MEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COGENCE MEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROCHELLE MOSKOWITZ

KIMBERLEY K ADAMS70 PINE STNEW YORK, NY 10270UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009interactive multimedia safety and health training programs on CD-ROMsABANDONED—
016printed instructional materials to install computer hardware; printed instructional materials for the use of CD-ROMs in the field of safety and health training programs; packaging; labels; printed brochures, advertising, solicitation materials for safety and health training on CD-ROMsABANDONED—
035marketing of interactive multimedia safety and health training programs on CD-ROMsABANDONED—
041on-site training and instruction in the use of CD-ROMs in the field of safety and health trainingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance