USPTO serial 75323007
"CHEESES OF NAZARETH"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2435494Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2001
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with "CHEESES OF NAZARETH"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES BRUNO
CHARLES BRUNO PFEIFFER & BRUNO, P.C.203 SOUTH 7TH STREETEASTON, PA 18042-4315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheese, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Calandra, Salvatore F.
- Other trademarks owned by Calandra, Salvatore F.
- Other trademarks owned by Calandra, Salvatore F.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named "CHEESES OF NAZARETH"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |