USPTO serial 75323229
CONCERTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONCERTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL BOURQUE
DANIEL BOURQUE BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP835 HANOVER ST STE 303MANCHESTER, NH 03104-5401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | suite of software for call center products built around a core automation engine to process call and customer information according to pre-defined business rules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |