Drawing for MOTION MARINE

USPTO serial 75323590

MOTION MARINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTION MARINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER C S BLATTNER

CHRISTOPHER C S BLATTNER TAYLORNUNN MOTSCHENBACHER & BLATTNER117 SW TAYLOR ST STE 2000PORTLAND, OR 97204-3010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012custom boats constructed of welded aluminumACTIVEMar 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 21, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 10, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 15, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance