Drawing for CHEMICAL MILLING

USPTO serial 75324462

CHEMICAL MILLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEMICAL MILLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J ORLANDO

JOSEPH J ORLANDO BUCKNAM & ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY LONG ISLAND, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical preparations for use in the processing of leatherACTIVE—
002colorants for use in the processing of leatherACTIVE—
004greases for use in the processing of leathersACTIVE—
007machines, namely, combination milling, upgrading, and finishing with special effects machines, for use in the dry processing of leatherACTIVE—
009climatic controls to control the microclimate inside machines for the processing of leatherACTIVE—
011machines, namely, combination milling, upgrading, and finishing with special effects machines, for use in the dry processing of leatherACTIVEFeb 27, 1996
018leather sold in bulkACTIVEFeb 27, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 22, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 22, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 22, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 13, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 2, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 18, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 4, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 22, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance