USPTO serial 75324595
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Downsview, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B EISEN
MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIOTORONTO ONT M5H 3R3QUEEN ST W STE 26 3202 102 M5H 3R3,BOLIVIA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet preparations and cosmetics, namely, lipsticks, blushers, eyeliners, eye shadows, mascaras, eye creams, foundations, nail enamels, face and skin creams and moisturizers, body lotions and bath products, namely, bath gels, bath oils, body washes, soap and cleansing bars; cocoa butters and lotions, skin lotions, namely, body lotions, cleansing lotions and moisturizers; skin whiteners, namely, skin creams, face creams and skin bleaching creams; colognes; shaving creams and lotions; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioners, petroleum based hair conditioners, castor oil conditioners, Indian hemp conditioners, hair lotion conditioners, hair dressings and conditioners, petroleum jelly based hair dressings, hair creams, hair lotions, oil treatments, hair and scalp conditioners, hair gels, styling gels, hair moisturizers, hair sprays, hair colours, hair sculpting and styling gels, hair curl activator gels, hair growth enhancing conditioners, hair food conditioners, hair and scalp conditioners and hair relaxers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |