Drawing for DATA PASSPORT

USPTO serial 75324625

DATA PASSPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATA PASSPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN R GURSKY

STEVEN R GURSKY GURSKY & EDERER LLP1350 BROADWAY FL 11NEW YORK, NY 10018-7702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic communication products and parts and accessories therefor, namely, portable and cellular radios, cellular, wireless, digital and personal telephones, cellular radio telephone communications modules and parts and interfaces therefor, namely, cellular transceivers, antennas, modems, battery interfaces, audio interfaces, control interfaces, power interfaces, computer hardware communication servers, computers, telephone handsets, satellite transceivers, antennas, pagers, battery chargers, global positioning system interfaces and apparatus, namely, GPS receiver modules, GPS antennas, correlators, low-noise amplifiers, controller and computer memory chips, computer software for interfacing with personal communication service hardware and telephones, computer software for interfacing with wireless communications hardware and telephones, computer software for interfacing with cellular voice pagers, telephones and computer hardware; batteries, battery eliminators, namely, battery and cigarette adapters; carrying cases for electronic communication products and portable and cellular radios, cellular, wireless, digital and personal telephonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 14, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Dec 21, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance