USPTO serial 75324670
TECLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75002 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES D HALSEY JR
WILLIAM F HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS SOLD IN BULK; BRACELETS (JEWELRY), RINGS (JEWELRY), BROOCHES (JEWELRY), NECKLACES (JEWELRY), EARRINGS (JEWELRY) AND KEY RINGS (JEWELRY) IN PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH; JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES, CHRONOMETERS, WATCHES, ARTIFICIAL PEARLS; ARTIFICIAL RUBIES; ARTIFICIAL EMERALDS; ARTIFICIAL SAPPHIRES; NATURAL AND CULTURED PEARLS; DIAMONDS; SEMI-PRECIOUS STONES AND GOLD JEWELRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |