USPTO serial 75324795
SAN ZENONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3503351Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAN ZENONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Prairie Harvest Canada Limited
Altona, Manitoba, CA
Prairie Harvest Canada Limited
Altona, Manitoba, CA
Prairie Harvest Canada Limited
Altona, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trevor C. Klotz
Trevor C. Klotz Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP340 Albert StreetSuite 1400Ottawa, K1R0A5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | tomato paste; soups and Italian soups, namely, minestrone, lentils, beans, vegetables, and noodle soups; processed whole and crushed tomatoes; processed vegetables and processed mixed vegetables; Italian food products, namely, processed tomatoes and vegetables, and cheeses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | pasta and pasta related products, namely, spaghetti, spaghettini, vermicelli, linguini, fettucine, lasagna, rigationi, mezzi rigatoni, penne lisce, penne, ziti cut, baby pastini, ditali elbows, baby shells, small shells, large shells, rotini, alphabets, noodles, macaroni, tortellini, ravioli, cappellini, twists, nests, angel hair; tomato sauces; rice; Italian food products, namely, pastas and pizza sauce; carbonated, non-carbonated, and non-alcoholic beverages, namely, tea, iced tea, and coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prairie Harvest Canada Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Prairie Harvest Canada Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Prairie Harvest Canada Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SAN ZENONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |