Drawing for LEARNING DIFFERENCES: EFFECTIVE TEACHING WITH LEARNING STYLES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES

USPTO serial 75324836

LEARNING DIFFERENCES: EFFECTIVE TEACHING WITH LEARNING STYLES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2374021Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 1, 2000
Examiner
ATCHISON, ALAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LEARNING DIFFERENCES: EFFECTIVE TEACHING WITH LEARNING STYLES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops for educating and instructing educators and administrators on student learning styles and multiple intelligencesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 31, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 1, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 17, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 1, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 17, 2010RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 17, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 4, 201089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Feb 4, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 23, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 9, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance