USPTO serial 75324954
UNIVERSAL FOOTWEAR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERSAL FOOTWEAR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADAM ORECK
ADAM ORECK ADAM ORECK KONCEPTS COMPANY & ASSOCIATES20 SECOND ST NE STE 2505MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | purses, handbags, wallets, belts, sports bags, leather bags, back packs, and book bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | sporting equipment, namely, golf equipment, baseball equipment, football equipment, basketball equipment, soccer equipment, hockey equipment, wrestling equipment, track equipment, gymnastic equipmnet, rugby equipment, volleyball equipment, running and jogging equipment, bicycling equipment, skiing equipment (downhill and cross-country), snowboarding equipment, inline skating equipment, hiking equipment, camping equipment, rock and mountain climbing equipment, swimming equipment, sky diving equipment, protective gear, including helmets, elbow and knee pads, wristbands, knee and ankle braces, auto racing equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |