USPTO serial 75324956
CITY NATIONAL BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITY NATIONAL BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEGAN D DORTENZO
MEGAN D DORTENZO STEPTOE & JOHNSONP O BOX 2190CLARKSBURG, WV 26302-2190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services, namely, consumer and commercial banking services, savings and checking account services, lending services, mortgage lending services, investment of funds for others, bank account services, and financial management and planning services | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |