USPTO serial 75325141
VISTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY B KITA
STANLEY B KITA HOWSON AND HOWSONSPRING HOUSE CORPORATE CTRBOX 457SPRING HOUSE, PA 19477Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in human resource management, namely, in maintaining personnel and benefits records, and in processing payrolls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |